首页> 外文OA文献 >International Arbitration: A New Mechanism to Settle Intra-State Territorial Disputes between States and Secessionist Movements? - The Divorce of Sudan and South Sudan and the Abyei Question
【2h】

International Arbitration: A New Mechanism to Settle Intra-State Territorial Disputes between States and Secessionist Movements? - The Divorce of Sudan and South Sudan and the Abyei Question

机译:国际仲裁:解决国家与分离运动之间的国家内部领土争端的新机制? -苏丹和南苏丹的离婚和阿卜耶伊问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2008, the Government of Sudan (GoS) and the Sudan People\u27s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A) submitted an arbitration agreement with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague. In a unique fast track procedure, an international arbitration tribunal had to determine in accordance with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of 2005, in particular the Abyei Protocol and Abyei Appendix, the Interim National Constitution (INC) and general principles of law, whether the Abyei Border Commission (ABC) exceeded its mandate, which was to define and demarcate the area of the nine Ngok Dinka chiefdoms transferred to Kordofan in 1905. In case of excess, the parties entrusted the tribunal with redefining the boundaries of the disputed territory based on the parties’ submissions. To guarantee the transparency of the procedure and to generate acceptance by all stakeholders on the ground, all hearings and documents were made publically available. The procedure and the more than 200-pages-long final Award from July 2009 constitute an illustrative example of an international dispute settlement procedure dealing with an intra-state (territorial) dispute between a state and a secessionist movement. The paper asks why and how the parties initiated the arbitration procedure and evaluates the still disputed status of the Abyei Region and the record of the parties’ (non-)compliance with the Abyei Award and its role in the ongoing status-negotiations between Sudan and the newly independent South Sudan. By inter alia taking a comparative perspective with other international dispute settlements the paper critically discusses the legal-political implications of the Abyei Arbitration and whether it could serve as a model or lesson learned when it comes to the effectiveness and success of international arbitration and its potential contribution to the settlement of intra-state (territorial) disputes.
机译:2008年,苏丹政府(GoS)和苏丹人民解放运动/军队(SPLM / A)向海牙常设仲裁法院(PCA)提交了仲裁协议。在一个独特的快速程序中,国际仲裁法庭必须根据2005年《全面和平协议》,特别是《阿卜耶伊议定书》和《阿卜耶伊附录》,《国家临时宪法》和一般法律原则,确定是否阿卜耶伊边境委员会(ABC)的任务超出了范围,该任务是界定和划定1905年移交给科尔多凡的9个恩哥克·丁卡酋长领地的范围。如果人数过多,则当事方委托法庭重新定义有争议领土的边界。各方的意见。为了保证程序的透明性并获得所有利益相关者的接受,所有听证会和文件均公开发布。该程序和自2009年7月起长达200多页的最终裁决构成了国际争端解决程序的说明性示例,该程序解决了国家与分离主义运动之间的内部(领土)争端。该文件询问当事方为何以及如何启动仲裁程序,并评估阿卜耶伊地区仍然有争议的地位,以及当事方(不)遵守阿卜耶伊奖的记录及其在苏丹与苏丹之间正在进行的地位谈判中的作用。新独立的南苏丹。除其他外,通过与其他国际争端解决进行比较,该论文批判性地讨论了阿卜耶伊仲裁的法律政治影响,以及在国际仲裁的有效性和成功性及其潜力方面,它是否可以作为典范或经验教训对解决州内(领土)争端的贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daase, Cindy;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号